/Proposal: Chemistry

Related: https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/128238/adding-mathjax-to-specific-questions-only/128240#128240

Most SE sites use MathJax for mathematical formatting. Will we need it? Also, does anyone know of a simple mathjax-like chemistry formula renderer (that way we can avoid too many <sup>/<sub>s) that we can use.

Another idea would be to write a short bunch of chem macros that will work in mathjax. Stuff like a by-default-\rm-style, and some other stuff. These can be loaded by simply inserting them in a hidden div enclosed in $....$.


closed as off topic by Robert Cartaino Apr 6 '12 at 18:56

Questions on Area 51 Discussions are expected to relate to a Stack Exchange site proposal, the Area 51 process, or the Area 51 software within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

This forum is really to address the proposal process. This discussion is better left for when the site is actually created. – Robert Cartaino Apr 6 '12 at 18:55

The MathJax 2.0 changelog mentions the following item:

New mhchem chemistry extension (adds \ce, \cf, and \cee macros)

So there seems to be some support for chemical equations in MathJax, and integrating that would certainly be useful.

The ChemDoodle Web Components are available under the GPL license and look like a nice way to integrate an editor for structure formulas.

Ooh great! I didn't know about the chem stuff [/rushes to update local copy of mathjax]. – Manishearth Mar 20 '12 at 15:55

MathJax is probably a good idea, considering that any kind of physical chemistry question will inevitably have to be explained in mathematical terms to some extent.


Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .