I just discovered that there's this close-as-off-topic reason on Area 51 Discussion Zone (emphasis added):

This looks like a question for a site that hasn't been created, yet. This forum is designed to discuss these proposals to create new sites. If a site is created for this subject, you might be able to ask your question there, but I have to close this as 'off topic' for this forum. Sorry about the confusion.

There's an awful wording error here. The close reason (which is written by a SE employee therefore it can be considered official) is calling this site a forum, which is not a forum by definition!

Shouldn't it look like this? (again, emphasis added)

This looks like a question for a site that hasn't been created, yet. This site is designed to discuss these proposals to create new sites. If a site is created for this subject, you might be able to ask your question there, but I have to close this as 'off topic' for this site. Sorry about the confusion.

share

The discussion zone is a forum for discussing proposed sites. While it uses the same Q&A format, the meta side of Area51 (or any site) is not a site of it's own.

This close reason is used when a person posts an example question as a discussion for the Area 51 proposal. We don't answer proposed site questions, discussion/meta is a forum, there is nothing to talk about in response.

The word forum is the correct word to use in this close reason.

share

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .