Proposal: Ethereum

This proposal has exactly 100 users, many who joined very recently, who only follow this proposal and have no associated Stack Overflow accounts.

Nearly a quarter joined in the past 12 hours.

I call shenanigans.

share
    
It has exactly 109 users now. I'd say there's nothing special about that number. – Mark Aug 9 '15 at 8:14
18  
109 is prime which makes it very special indeed – RyanSullivan Aug 13 '15 at 9:09
    
I disagree with the creation of this group for numerous reasons, but this doesn't surprise me. I don't think this is "shenanigans". Cryptocurrency people create MASSIVE fan bases. All it takes is one high-level user to suggest an SO site, and many followers will join just to up-vote the proposal. Ethereum has a huge following. This type of response doesn't surprise me at all. – RLH Dec 14 '15 at 16:29
    
@RLH I think you disagree for numerical reasons, rather. – New Alexandria Dec 28 '15 at 23:21

There's nothing fishy here. This is how Stack Exchange sites are supposed to be created — someone going out to find an enthusiastic community to support their proposal rather than relying on the existing Stack Exchange community to build it for them.

Stack Exchange was never intended to slice up the Stack Overflow pie into increasing smaller pieces. It was designed to spread this Q&A engine into more audiences.

So that's what looks so off here — they did it right.

share
1  
The linked reference on Reddit is a bit overly optimistic it and your answer neglect to mention the next requirement (Commitment Phase) for Stack Exchange experience "100 committers with 200+ rep on any other site" – James Jenkins Aug 11 '15 at 14:33
1  
@JamesJenkins I don't understand. What does any of that have to do with the topic at hand — the accusation that something fishy is going on? – Robert Cartaino Aug 11 '15 at 14:36
2  
Not to the topic, but the community that is developing seems to have little experience with SE and Area51 note the title on your link is "Ethereum gets its own StackExchange page with just 90 more upvotes y'all!!!" it and your answer may leave some people disappointed, when the definition phase is done, and the site does not launch. From what I see the energy is good but there challenges of Commitment Phase are significant. – James Jenkins Aug 11 '15 at 14:43
6  
@JamesJenkins In 7 days, they nearly completed the first phase, farther than the vast majority of proposals go. I don't know if they have the support to see this through, but I still fail to see why you think that is the topic of this conversation at all. That's okay; I answered the original question. You are free to answer however you see fit. – Robert Cartaino Aug 11 '15 at 14:50

This was just posted on the Ethereum subreddit. Not fishy. It's just that users are finding it now.

Many joined recently because Ethereum just launched like a week ago.

share
    
The reddit announcement reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/3g8b9b/… – Joris Bontje Aug 9 '15 at 9:06
1  
Additionally, the creation of this Ethereum Stack Overflow was recently announced on social media. People were encouraged to create accounts and vote. – user75798 Aug 9 '15 at 10:25
3  
@user75798 Asking people to create accounts just to vote is dubious. It's awfully close to using sock puppets. Only when these people understand the Stack Exchange model and Area 51 process, should they be asked to vote. – S.L. Barth Aug 9 '15 at 17:38
3  
Ethereum people are very familiar with computing. There is certainly a need for a Stack Exchange forum dedicated to Ethereum. It is just the sort of project for which Stack Exchange is intended. I was surprised there wasn't already an established Stack Exchange for Ethereum. It should have been started long ago. Hopefully, the Q&A that takes place in the Ethereum community will migrate here and there will be good answers to questions available when the project reaches the wider public, as it surely will. – user75798 Aug 9 '15 at 17:41
2  
That linked subreddit page specifically tells people to only vote on sub-10 vote questions. – user88642 Aug 10 '15 at 1:46
3  
@S.L.Barth, that tends to be self-correcting. The commitment phase requires a hundred established users. I expect this proposal will hit the 200-committed-user mark quickly enough, but struggle to reach the requirements for "established users" and "commitment score". – Mark Aug 11 '15 at 0:12

Ethereum is quite a large community of enthusiastic people, and most of them think that getting independent stackexchange is a cool idea.

share

Considering Ethereum just launched weeks ago there's nothing fishy about it.

share
2  
Much older projects, with larger user bases, are still having trouble getting their proposals off the ground. For example, the Django proposal. – S.L. Barth Aug 13 '15 at 13:50

You must log in to answer this question.